Platforms ask about AI differently. KDP separates AI-generated from AI-assisted. Xiaohongshu asks writers to declare AI polishing too. Writers who label honestly worry about getting it wrong; writers who forget a single AI paragraph risk a takedown.
The problem
After months of drafting, nobody remembers which paragraph started as an AI suggestion and which one they rewrote. Guessing either way is a risk.
How Scenaloom handles it
- Scenaloom keeps a record of every AI result you inserted and how much you changed it since.
- On the export page, choose where the work is going under “Where is this going?” You see the platform's question in its own terms, your answer built from the record, a checklist and where the rule comes from, with the date it was read.
- Copy the note into the platform's form. It lists the chapters where text began as AI.
Destinations
Books: Amazon KDP, Royal Road, Wattpad, Kakuyomu, Shōsetsuka ni Narō, Qidian, Fanqie and Jinjiang. Scripts: Douyin, micro-drama platforms in China, the WGA, the WGGB, the Nicholl and other festivals. Both: Xiaohongshu, Naver Series and KakaoPage. Where a rule comes from reports rather than the platform's own page, the page says so and asks you to check the current terms.
The result
An answer you can stand behind, matching what the record shows. It is a record, not an AI detector: it reads what happened in Scenaloom and cannot see AI you used elsewhere, so the checklist asks you about that.
Questions
Is this an AI detector?
No. It reads the project's record of AI results you kept, not the style of the text.
What about AI I used in another app?
Scenaloom cannot see it. The checklist reminds you to include it, for example a cover made elsewhere or a translation.
Try it on a story. Start free with “The Salt Road”, the example on this page, or with your own work.
Start free with this example